Yerushalayim in/out times for Shabbat PARSHAT lech lecha Candles 5:31PM • Havdala 6:43PM • Rabbeinu Tam 7:23PM I find it interesting that when people ask me when I made Aliyah and I answer 36 years ago, they often respond by telling me Kol Hakavod. I always make a point to say that I was 9 years old when my parents told me our family was making Aliyah. My parents were the altruistic ones who left their businesses, sold their house, said goodbye to all of their families and friends in America, and moved to the Land that was promised to their forefathers in this week’s Parsha of Lech Lecha. Just like Avraham Avinu had never stepped foot in Israel prior to coming here, so too my parents had not been to Israel prior to our Aliyah flight. Any Kol Hakavod which people give me is focused in the wrong direction. They get 100% credit for my siblings and I making Aliyah and Baruch Hashem celebrating 36 years as Israeli citizens. Seeing what my parents went through and hearing the stories of other special Jews that took the Avraham Avinu test and made Aliyah from all four corners of the world makes it evident why the Israeli government established a day called Yom HaAliyah. Every single Oleh has his/her own story of challenges and triumphs to share, and our country would not be what it is today without the dedication and passion of the Olim. Tremendous credit goes to those that take upon themselves to help others make Aliyah, including our very own OU Israel Center, Pearl & Harold Jacobs Zula Outreach Center, NCSY, Yachad, JLIC, Camp Dror, and many other organizations that work tirelessly to help Jews from all over the world make Aliyah. We at OU Israel take great pride in our partnership with the Jerusalem Municipality and our joint initiatives to ensure English-speaking Olim to Yerushalayim are able to successfully integrate. I’d like to give a special thank you to Pini Glinkewitz, Director of the Municipal Absorption Authority at the Municipality of Jerusalem, for his dedication and passion to this mission. In recognition of Yom HaAliyah, OU Israel is proud to partner with the Jerusalem Municipality on a month long Chodesh HaAliyah initiative. Highlights of this initiative will include special Shiurim and articles focused on topics related to Aliyah and numerous additional lectures and activities for Olim. (Keep up to date with our ads in Torah Tidbits.) I am also excited to share a special new website aimed at helping teens maximize their Aliyah experience: www.teensurvivalguidealiyah.com. This website was created by teen Olah Tzippora Felsenthal who writes that “The vision for this website is to have a tool in place to combat difficulties that teens will encounter throughout their journey of aliyah. My hope is for teenage olim to have a positive experience, one of success and pleasure, feeling as they truly belong here in Israel.” Knowing her father, Rabbi Dave Felsenthal, I am not surprised that Tzippora took the initiative to create this website. I met Rabbi Dave when I was the regional director of the Pacific Northwest region of NCSY nearly 20 years ago. His love and passion for NCSY and Israel was something which was evident from the moment you met him. He and his family are among the many Olim who are positively impacting the State of Israel after taking the Avraham Avinu test. I encourage all of you to visit this Teen Survival Guide for Aliyah website to learn more about the challenges and successes of teen Olim and to share with those you know who could benefit from it. Not only that, but I recommend you think about ways that you – with your individual skills and relationships – can be helpful to others making Aliyah. Sometimes it’s helping a new Oleh understand their electric or arnona bill, sometimes it’s helping a new Oleh with homework, and other times it’s simply inviting them to join you for a shiur or a cup of coffee. Let’s constantly think outside of the box with ways that we can all help others. OU Israel is extremely proud of a new resource for English-speaking Olim – the OU Kosher Israel Guide 5782 – 2021/22 which was published by our Gustave & Carol Jacobs Center for Kashrut Education in conjunction with OU Kashrut. Tremendous credit goes to Rabbi Ezra Friedman (Editor), Ita Rochel Russek (Assistant Editor), Yael Hauftmann (Graphic Designer), Rabbi Yissachar Dov Krakowski (Director, OU Kosher Israel Department), and the many others who worked tirelessly on this guide. As you will see when you read it, it addresses many Kashrut questions and topics (including Shemitah) that Olim and visitors face when it comes to understanding Kashrut in Israel. I encourage you to view it online here: www.ouisrael.org/kashrut or obtain a hard copy at the OU Israel Center or by asking your Torah Tidbits distributor. Wishing you an uplifting and inspiring Shabbat, Avi, Executive Director, OU Israel aberman@ouisrael.org ALIYA BY ALIYA SEDRA SUMMARY The Parsha introduces the Jewish people. Avraham journeys to the Land of Israel, is promised the Land, spends time in Egypt due to a famine, separates from Lot due to their great wealth, and rescues Lot when he is taken captive in war. Avraham is promised the Land, though told his descendants will spend 400 years in Egypt. Sarah has no child, Hagar bears Yishmael, Avraham is promised that Sarah will bear a child. He is given the mitzvah of mila, circumcision, as a sign of the covenant. 1st Aliya (12:1-13). Avram (while we refer to him as Avraham his name begins as Avram and is only changed later) is told to journey to the land he will be shown. There he will achieve family, fortune and fame. The family journeys with Shechem as their first stop. G-d appears to Avraham and promises him the land. He builds an altar. A famine forces the family to seek relief in Egypt. Avraham is the first to be told to journey to a place, not away from a place. Adam and Eve were sent out of the Garden, Cain sent away to wander the earth, Tower of Babel the people dispersed. Avraham reverses this trend: he is not sent away from G-d but pulled near to Him. The story of the Torah is the story of promises. Avraham is given 3 personal promises and one national one. He is told he will have family, have fortune and have fame. And his people will inherit the Land. G-d makes promises to man. Unsolicited, perhaps undeserved. Though we come to know Avraham as a great man, the Torah is mum on any background to receiving these promises. For it is a story of G-d’s desire for a people – it is His reach to us. 2nd Aliya (12:14-13:4). The family goes to Egypt fleeing famine. Paro sees Sarah and she is taken to his palace. Avraham is lavished with wealth because of her. Paro sends them away. The family returns to where they began, laden with wealth, to call in the name of G-d. Avraham’s 3 promises, family, fortune and fame, will be fulfilled one by one. First fortune. Promise fulfilled – Avraham returns to the land from Egypt laden with wealth. The Ramban points out the foreshadowing of the Exodus from Egypt – just as here Avraham journeys to Egypt because of famine, Paro suffers a plague, Jews leave with great wealth, so too this story repeats with the entire Jewish nation in the exodus from Egypt. What does it mean that Avraham called in the name of G-d? Ibn Ezra says either he prayed. Or he called to people to embrace G-d. Avraham engages the people of the Land in knowledge of one G-d. 3rd Aliya (13:5-18). The herds of Avraham and Lot are so numerous that their shepherds quarrel. They need to separate. Avraham allows Lot to choose – you go left, I right. You go right, I left. Lot chooses the lush area he sees around Sodom and Gemora. Avraham is told by G-d to look over the Land for he will have it all forever. And his children will be as numerous as the sand of the earth. He moves to Hevron and builds an altar. The promise of fortune has been granted. But his only family, Lot, moves away. This is followed by a reiteration that Avraham’s children will inherit the Land – except, he has no children. He only has Lot. And Lot’s judgement is suspect. Eyes have been a bit of a problem in the Torah so far. Eve looked at the fruit and it was beautiful. Before the flood, the men looked at the women and chose wives. Lot looks at the Jordan Valley and it looks like the lushness of Egypt. Looks deceive; for while beautiful, each of these failed to consider more than the looks. Looking will be replaced for the Jew by hearing, Shema, listening to the Divine Command. Seeing beauty will be usurped by hearing the Command. 4th Aliya (14:1-20). Four Kings make war with 5 Kings. Lot is taken captive. Avraham rescues him, returning all the spoils and captives. The King of Sodom comes out to greet him, as does Malchizedek the King and Priest of Shalem. Malchizedek blesses Avraham to G-d and blesses G-d for protecting Avraham. The promise of fame has been achieved. After the heroic rescue of Lot, Avraham finds the company of Kings. 2 of the 3 promises he received, those of fame and of fortune have been achieved. The remaining 2 – of children and of inheriting this Land are tougher. Lest we think that G-d promised a deserted land to Avraham, this pitched battle of 9 kings belies that. Not only has Avraham been promised that his children will inherit the Land while he has no children, he has been told he will inherit a hotly contested Land. 5th Aliya (14:21-15:6). The King of Sodom offers Avraham the spoils; Avraham demurs. G-d promises Avraham that he need not fear, for He will be his shield (magen). Avraham protests – I have no children. G-d promises that his children will inherit his promises. He shows him the stars and promises that his children will be as those. Avraham believes Him. G-d promises to be Avraham’s shield, his “magen”; Malchizedek used the same expression, that G-d was Avraham’s “magen”. Hence the description we use in tefilla of Magen Avraham. As a conversation starter, G-d says to Avraham, “do not fear”. Who said Avraham is afraid? What is he afraid of? Rashi comments that Avraham is worried that he has been showered with so much from G-d already that perhaps he does not deserve to have the remaining promises granted. The remaining 2 promises are big ones; children and the Land of Israel. Perhaps I no longer deserve those. Some promises are conditional – you deserve it, you will get it. Perhaps he has used up all his merit and deserves no more. G-d tells him to not fear for his merit is great. 6th Aliya (15:7-17:6). After promising Avraham that he will have children, G-d again promises to him that He will give him the Land of Israel. Avraham queries as to how he will know this for certain. In a dramatic ceremony of cut birds and a deep sleep, Avraham is told his children will be strangers and afflicted in a foreign land for 400 years. Avraham will die in peace. G-d makes a covenant to give the Land to Avraham’s offspring. Sarah has no child. She gives Hagar to Avraham and Hagar becomes pregnant. Sarah sends Hagar away. An angel tells her that her offspring will be many. Her child will be cantankerous but powerful. Avraham is 86 when Yishmael is born. At age 99 Avraham is told to walk before G-d. His name is changed to Avraham. Avraham was given 3 personal promises and one national one. He was promised fame and fortune, which he received. He is assured he will have children, which he believes. But those are promises to him. He wonders now about the promise that his descendants will inherit the Land of Israel – what if they don’t deserve it? G-d puts him to sleep, a tardema – the same word used when Adam went to sleep and Eve was formed – a deep, historic, epic sleep. And G-d tells him that these promises will be kept. The Torah continues the startling story of G-d’s unconditional promises to man. Still no demands have been made of Avraham. But the Torah also teaches us a lesson about promises: patience. The promise that the Jewish people will have the Land of Israel is going to take 400 years to happen. Avraham will not see that one fulfilled. Nor, in fact, will Moshe. The Torah will end with that one not yet fulfilled. Man lives patiently with promises yet to be fulfilled. 7th Aliya (17:7-27). Avraham is told to circumcise his family as a sign of the covenant between him and G-d. He is startled at the promise that Sarah will have a child at age 90, he 99. He suggests that Yishmael could be the next generation of the Jewish people. No, while Yishmael will be great, Yitzchak will be the next generation. Avraham is reluctant to give up on Yishmael as the heir to the Jewish people. Perhaps this is Avraham’s persistent kindness – he sees good, even greatness in Yishmael. But that type of greatness is not sufficient: greatness comes in different shapes and sizes. Yishmael is great in his way: Yitzchak will be great in a different way. There is greatness amongst the nations of the world: but Jewish greatness is different. Haftorah Lech Lecha Yeshayahu 40:27- 41:16 The prophet Yeshayahu reminds Israel of the Almighty’s power. Hashem has the ability to “renew the vigor” of those who put their faith in Him. Highlighting the theme of strength and fortitude the prophet turns his attention to the idolatrous nations of the world and offers the following message. He emphasizes the greatness of Avraham after arriving in Canaan that he pursued and defeated four mighty kings. “The islands saw and feared: the ends if the earth quaked.” There is a message to be heeded by the people of the world when witnessing the power of Israel. Seeing the remarkable power of God and his people should inspire nations to abandon their sinful idolatrous ways. The prophet also spotlights the eternal promise that the Jewish nation will be rewarded for their loyalty to God. “Do not fear for I am with you; be not dismayed for I am your God...Behold all those incensed against you shall be ashamed and confounded; those who quarrelled with you shall be as naught and be lost.” RABBI LORD JONATHAN SACKS ZTL How Perfect Were The Matriarchs & Patriarchs? In an extraordinary series of observations on this week’s parsha, Ramban (Nahmanides, 1194 – 1270) delivers harsh criticisms of Abraham and Sarah. The first has to do with Abraham’s decision to leave the land of Canaan and go to Egypt because “there was a famine in the land” (Gen. 12:1). On this Ramban says: Know that Abraham our father unintentionally committed a great sin by bringing his righteous wife to a stumbling-block of sin on account of his fear for his life. He should have trusted that God would save him and his wife and all his belongings, for God surely has the power to help and to save. His leaving the Land concerning which he had been commanded from the beginning, on account of the famine, was also a sin he committed, for in famine God would redeem him from death. It was because of this deed that the exile in the land of Egypt at the hand of Pharaoh was decreed for his children. According to Ramban, Abraham should have stayed in Canaan and had faith in God that He would sustain him despite the famine. Not only was Abraham wrong to leave, he also put Sarah in a position of moral hazard because, as a result of going to Egypt, she was forced to tell the lie that she was Abraham’s sister not his wife, and consquently she was taken into Pharaoh’s harem where she might have been forced to commit an act of adultery. This is a very harsh judgment, made more so by Ramban’s further assertion that it was because of this lack of faith that Abraham’s children were sentenced to exile in Egypt centuries later. Further in the parsha, Ramban also criticises Sarah’s actions. In her despair that she might never have a child of her own, she asks Abraham to sleep with her handmaid Hagar in the hope that she might bear him a child. Abraham does so, and Hagar becomes pregnant. The text then says that Hagar “began to despise her mistress” (Gen. 16:4). Sarah complains to Abraham, and then “afflict[s]” Hagar (Gen. 16:6), who flees from her into the desert. On this, Ramban writes: Our mother [Sarah] transgressed by this affliction, as did Abraham by allowing her to do so. So God heard her [Hagar’s] affliction and gave her a son who would be a wild ass of a man to afflict the seed of Abraham and Sarah with all kinds of affliction. (Ramban, Commentary to Genesis 16:6) Here the moral judgment is easier to understand. Sarah’s conduct does seem volatile and harsh. The Torah itself says that Sarah “afflicted” Hagar. Yet Ramban seems to be saying that it was this episode in the ancient past that explains Jewish suffering at the hands of Muslims (descendants of Ishmael) in a much later age. It is not difficult to defend Abraham and Sarah in these incidents, and other commentators do so. Abraham was not to know that God would perform a miracle and save him and Sarah from famine had they stayed in Canaan. Nor was he to know that the Egyptians would endanger his life and place Sarah in a moral dilemma. Neither of them had been to Egypt before. They did not know in advance what to expect. As for Sarah and Hagar, although an Angel sent Hagar back to the household, later when Ishmael and Isaac were born Sarah once again banished Hagar. This time, though Abraham protested, God told him to do what Sarah said. So Ramban’s criticisms are easily answered. Why then did he make them? Ramban surely did not make these comments lightly. He was, I believe, driven by another consideration altogether, namely the justice of history. Why did the Israelites suffer exile and slavery in Egypt? Why in Ramban’s own age were Jews subject to attack by radical Islamists, the Almohades, who brought to an end the Golden Age of Spain they had enjoyed under the more tolerant rule of the Umayyads. Ramban believed, as we say in our prayers, that “because of our sins we were exiled from our land,” but what sins had the Israelites committed in the days of Jacob that merited exile? He also believed that “the acts of the fathers are a sign for the children” (Commentary to Gen. 12:6), and that what happened in the lives of the patriarchs foreshadowed what would happen to their descendants. What had they done to Ishmael to earn the scorn of Muslims? A close reading of the biblical text pointed Ramban in the direction of Sarah’s treatment of Hagar. So Ramban’s comments make sense within his reading of Jewish history. But this, too, is not without its difficulties. The Torah states explicitly that God may punish “the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation” (Ex. 34:7) but not beyond. The Rabbis further restricted this to cases where “the children continue the sins of the parents.” (Rashi to Ex. 34:7, Jeremiah 31:28, and Ezekiel 18:2) Jeremiah and Ezekiel both said that no one would any more say, “the parents have eaten sour grapes and their children’s teeth are set on edge.” The transfer of sins across the generations is problematic, Jewishly and ethically. What is deeply interesting about Ramban’s approach to Abraham and Sarah is his willingness to point out flaws in their behaviour. This answers a fundamental question as far as our understanding of the narratives of Genesis is concerned. How are we to judge our biblical ancestors when their behaviour seems problematic: Jacob taking Esau’s blessing in disguise, for example, or Shimon and Levi’s brutality in the course of rescuing their sister Dina? The stories of Genesis are often morally perplexing. Rarely does the Torah pass an explicit, unequivocal verdict on people’s conduct. This means that it is sometimes difficult to teach these narratives as a guide to how to behave. This led to the Rabbis’ systematic reinterpretation in Midrash so that black and white take the place of subtle shades of grey. For example, the words “Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian … mocking” (Gen. 21:9), were understood by the Sages to mean that the thirteen-year-old Ishmael was guilty of idolatry, illicit sex or murder. This is clearly not the plain sense of the verse. It is, instead, an interpretation that would justify Sarah’s insistence that Ishmael be sent away. Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Chajes explained that the entire tendency of Midrash to make the heroes seem perfect and the villains completely evil is for educational reasons. The word Torah means “teaching” or “instruction,” and it is difficult to teach ethics through stories whose characters are fraught with complexity and ambiguity. Yet the Torah does paint its characters in shades of grey. Why so? He gives three reasons. The first is that the moral life is not something we understand in depth all at once. As children we hear stories of heroes and villains. We learn basic distinctions: right and wrong, good and bad, permitted and forbidden. As we grow, though, we begin to realise how difficult some decisions are. Do I go to Egypt? Do I stay in Canaan? Do I show compassion to my servant’s child at the risk that he may be a bad influence on my child who has been chosen by God for a sacred mission? Anyone who thinks such decisions are easy is not yet morally mature. So the best way of teaching ethics is to do so by way of stories that can be read at different levels at different times in our life. Second, not only are decisions difficult. People are also complex. No one in the Torah is portrayed as perfect. Noah, the only person in Tanach to be called righteous, ends drunk and dishevelled. Moses, Aaron and Miriam are all punished for their sins. So is King David. Solomon, wisest of men, ends his life as a deeply compromised leader. Many of the prophets suffered dark nights of despair. “There is none so righteous on earth,” says Kohelet, “as to do only good and never sin.” No religious literature was ever further from hagiography, idealisation and hero-worship. In the opposite direction, even the non-heroes have their saving graces. Esau is a loving son, and when he meets his brother Jacob after a long estrangement, they kiss, embrace and go their separate ways. Levi, condemned by Jacob for his violence, counts Moses, Aaron and Miriam among his grandchildren. Even Pharaoh, the man who enslaved the Israelites, had a moral heroine for a daughter. The descendants of Korach sang psalms in the Temple of Solomon. This too is moral maturity, light-years removed from the dualism adopted by many religions, including some Jewish sects (like the Qumran sect of the Dead Sea Scrolls), that divides humanity into children of light and children of darkness. Lastly and most importantly, more than any other religious literature, the Torah makes an absolute distinction between earth and heaven, God and human beings. Because God is God, there is space for humans to be human. In Judaism the line dividing them is never blurred. How rare this is was pointed out by Walter Kaufmann: In India, the Jina and the Buddha, founders of two new religions in the sixth century BCE, came to be worshipped later by their followers. In China, Confucius and Lao-tze came to be deified. To the non-Christian, Jesus seems to represent a parallel case. In Greece, the heroes of the past were held to have been sired by a god or to have been born of goddesses, and the dividing line between gods and men became fluid. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered divine. In Israel, says Kaufmann, “no man was ever worshipped or accorded even semi-divine status. This is one of the most extraordinary facts about the religion of the Old Testament.” There never was a cult of Moses or any other biblical figure. That is why “no man knows Moses’ burial place to this day” (Deut. 34:6), so that it could never become a place of pilgrimage. No religion has held a higher view of humanity than the Book that tells us we are each in the image and likeness of God. Yet none has been more honest about the failings of even the greatest. God does not ask us to be perfect. He asks us, instead, to take risks in pursuit of the right and the good, and to acknowledge the mistakes we will inevitably make. In Judaism the moral life is about learning and growing, knowing that even the greatest have failings and even the worst have saving graces. It calls for humility about ourselves and generosity towards others. This unique blend of idealism and realism is morality at its most demanding and mature. RABBI NACHMAN NEIL WINKLER The very first parasha of the Torah depicts the creation of the universe but focuses, primarily, on the creation of humankind. Actually, it is not the creation of the human that is the focus of the parasha. Rather, it is the story, the history, of those first generations of modern man. It relates a story of great promise that ends in great disappointment and the closing psukim tell us how Hashem regrets that creation because of the growing corruption of Mankind and decreed the destruction of the Man He created. The second parasha relates the story of that promised punishment, i.e., the story of No’ach and the flood. Here too we read of a creation, actually, a re-creation of a world to be populated by the descendants No’ach, an individual that had proven righteous in the eyes of Hashem and, therefore, one who, Hashem felt, could spread G-d’s moral code and create an ethical society. And, by the end of that parasha, we read of the generation that built the Tower of Babel and, by doing so, ignored Hashem’s command to spread out and “fill the earth”. This week’s parasha is different from the earlier ones. In this Torah reading of Lech Lecha we read of one who follows G-d’s commands and succeeds in drawing others to the worship of the one G-d. We learn of a righteous couple who manage to impact others and influence an entire generation….and more. When this parasha ends we no longer read of the corruption of society but of the brit made between Hashem and Avraham. Avraham, just one individual, who, together with Sarah, built the family who would spread the divine message to all. Our haftarah begins with Yishayahu questioning Israel’s doubts about G-d’s powers and His ability to keep His promises of protecting them. The navi continues to tell of Hashem’s wonders and accomplishments, even mocking the many nations filled with idolaters who labor in creating man-made gods, but will fail to stand up before the power of THE ONE – the Al-mighty One. In underscoring his message, Yishayahu explains that their nation is the descendants of Avraham who love G-d. He, as but one, was able to influence the many; he, although small in number, was able to overcome the powerful multitudes. And all because Hashem protected and empowered him – as He would do to Avraham’s nation. This is the primary connection of our haftarah to the parasha. Often, we fail to pick up on the prophet’s subtle theme - the theme of G-d helping and protecting those who follow Him, as He did to Avraham, though they might be few and seem to be weak. Yet, it was a powerful message to a tottering nation threatened by larger and stronger enemies. Ultimately, Chazal’s decision to read the 40th and 41st prakim of Sefer Yishayahu for this week’s haftarah was not based simply on the one mention found of Avraham Avinu in the haftarah. Rather, we should focus on the essential lesson Yishayahu taught his contemporaries. And, by teaching them, he taught us as well. RABBI SHALOM ROSNER Avraham’s Acceptance and Rejection of Gifts There are two situations in the parsha that at first glance seem to contradict each other, yet can be reconciled to be clearly identified with a common theme. Following Avraham’s victory on behalf of the five kings, the king of Sodom offers Avraham to partake in the spoils from the battle. Avraham refuses to accept any gift and states: “Neither from a thread to a shoe strap, nor will I take from whatever is yours, that you should not say, ‘I have made Avraham wealthy.’ (Bereshis 14:23). Yet, while in Mitzrayim, Avraham receives gifts from Pharaoh in exchange for Sarah, as the Torah tells us: “And he benefited Avraham for her sake, and he had flocks and cattle and donkeys and men servants and maid servants, and she donkeys and camels. (Bereshis 12: 16). Once Pharaoh was punished for having taken Avraham’s wife and Sarah is returned to Avraham, shouldn’t Avraham have returned the gifts? In fact, why did Avraham even accept the gifts at all? He had previously rejected gifts offered by the King of Sodom, lest others speculate that Avraham was enriched by others rather than by Hashem. Why this seemingly conflicting behavior? The Be’er Yosef offers a profound explanation. The gifts granted by Pharaoh to Avraham were not in exchange for Sara, rather they were to portray Pharaoh’s appreciation of and infatuation with Sarah. We find a similar occurrence when Achashverosh throws a party on behalf of Esther to depict his love for her to the masses. Since it was not in exchange for Sarah, Avraham did not have a moral obligation to return the gifts. Yet, why did it not bother Avraham that others may perceive that Pharaoh made Avraham rich, as it perturbed him when offered gifts by the King of Sodom? The Be’er Yosef suggests that Avraham’s intention was to sanctify God’s name. What transpired in Mitzrayim, that Pharaoh’s palace was plagued due to having taken Avraham’s wife was not publicized. Avraham accepted the cattle so that when he returned to Israel, everyone would see his riches and understand that they were received by Avraham from Pharaoh in a scenario where the hand of God acted to protect Avraham. The riches were a means to highlight the miracle that transpired in Mitzrayim. With respect to the battle on behalf of the kings, that itself was publicized by the proud kings and well celebrated in five kingdoms and there was no need to obtain riches to sanctify God’s name in that instance. What we see is that Avraham utilized riches as a means to be Mekadesh Shem Shamayim. When assets would not enhance that cause, they were unnecessary. A similar idea may be derived from another episode in the parsha as well. When Avraham initially sets out towards Israel Lot follows as is stated: “And Avraham went, as Hashem had spoken to him, and Lot went with him (Bereshis 12:4). Yet, when Avraham returns from Mitzrayim, it seems like Lot’s accompaniment is an afterthought “And Avraham came up from Mitzrayim, he and his wife and all that was his, and Lot with him, to the south.” (Bereshis 13:1). The Birchas Yitzhak (citing Rav Yosef Soloveichik emphasizes that there is a reference to the riches that Avraham accumulated in Mitzrayim prior to the phrase that states that Lot joined the returning journey. Apparently in Mitzrayim, Lot was amazed by the luxuries and abundance of wealth. Whereas, on Avraham’s initial journey Lot was a participant due to ruchniyus, on this second journey Lot was along for the gashmiyus. Lot ends up separating from Avraham and for materialistic considerations settles in the evil city of Sodom. The rest, as they say - is history. Avraham used his wealth to sanctify God’s name, through displaying evidence of the miracle that had occurred in Mitzrayim. Avraham also used his wealth to enrich the lives of others through his acts of chesed. When being enriched did not serve this purpose, it was rejected by Avraham. In contrast, Lot was mesmerized by wealth and sought it as ends in itself rather than a means through which to sanctify God’s name and enhance mankind. May we follow in Avraham’s footsteps and always recognize that all our gifts are from Hashem. We should utilize them in a way that can help others. Whether through charity for the sick and underprivileged or to strengthen Torah learning and Torah institutions. May we be blessed with the ability to use the gifts we are granted to be mekadesh shem shamayim! REBBETZIN SHIRA SMILES Significant Signature The first brachah in Shemoneh Esrei is referred to as Avot, the brachah of our forefathers. It is therefore curious that although all three of the Avot are mentioned at the beginning of the brachah, we conclude with “Magen Avraham”, only mentioning Avraham Avinu. The source for this lies in the blessing Hashem gave Avraham Avinu, “vheye brachah”, and you shall become a blessing. (Bereisheet 12;2). Rashi comments “becha chotmin”, the brachah (referring to the brachah of Avot in Shemoneh Esrei) will close with Avraham’s name. It is from the koach of Avraham Avinu that all others are blessed. Why is this so? Rav Wolbe explains that a Jew’s spiritual DNA is inbred from Avraham Avinu. By singling him out at the end of this brachah, we emphasize that our spiritual heritage comes from him. Throughout the ages, every simple Jew’s belief in Hashem is a manifestation of this bequest and has facilitated our survival. Hence the brachah ends “magen Avraham”, emunah is our protective shield. Emunah, the Netivot Shalom explains, is the foundation of Judaism. In a discussion of the essential principles of Torah, the Gemara distills it down to the words of the prophet Chavakuk, “vetzadik bemunato yichye” (Chavakuk 2;4). Saying the words magen Avraham allows us to solidify this aspect that Avraham Avinu ingrained in us and fortify our emunah daily. In the merit of emunah we were redeemed, and in its merit, we will be redeemed in the future. This is true on a national level and on an individual level as well. To the extent that we acknowledge Hashem as the source of all blessing, we can be conduits to bring this blessing into our lives and the lives of those around us. Rav Belsky in Einei Yisrael understands “becha chotmin” in a slightly different way. Each of the first three brachot in Shemoneh Esrei correspond to each of the three Avot. The first associates the middah of chesed with Avraham Avinu, the second brachah, gevurot, is associated with Yitzchak Avinu, and the third brachah, kedushah, with Yaakov Avinu. Only the first brachah ends with Avraham’s name, while the following two brachot don’t mention the Av to which it corresponds. This, says Rav Belsky, is because the middah of chesed is the hallmark of every Jew. Avraham Avinu gifted us with this shield. The Shelah Hakadosh teaches “chesed kel kol hayom” (Tehillim 52;3), no day should go by without doing an act of chesed. Taking this further, the Saba of Slabodka notes that chesed is not just filling another’s need, rather it is becoming a giver. This then is the deeper understanding of “becha chotmin”, notes Rav Dessler. Hashem is telling Avraham, in the future of the Jewish people when there is no longer a Beit Hamikdash and no Sanhedrin, the qualities of Yitzchak Avinu’s avodah, and Yaakov Avinu’s Torah will be weakened. However, the quality of chesed will always remain the strength of the Jew. Yeshayahu Hanavi (1;27) declared, “tzion bemishpat tipadeh, veshaveha betzedakah”. The ultimate redemption will be in the merit of acts of charity and kindness. This is the chatima, the final stamp that will bring the geulah. Every day we daven and have a constant reminder to actualize these two fundamental aspects that Avraham Avinu invested within us, emunah and chesed. In doing so, we become the harbingers of the redemption. RABBI JUDAH MISCHEL Lech Lecha: Baderech… On the Path Reb Hillel Paritcher was a baal avodah and dedicated chasid of the Alter Rebbe and his successors. A Chasidic master in his own right, Reb Hillel was an intense eved Hashem known for his lengthy, meditative tefillah and his dedication and attachment to tzadikim. One Wednesday morning while learning Torah in his hometown of Bobroisk, Reb Hillel was moved by a deep desire to spend Shabbos with his Rebbe in the city of Lubavitch, many miles away. But making it there in time for Shabbos was highly unlikely. A young chassid eager to assist Reb Hillel offered to bring Reb Hillel to Lubavitch with his strong horses and new carriage; they could make it for Shabbos if they left right away and on condition that Reb Hillel would not take too much time in his davening. They embarked on the journey and spent the night at a kretchma, a roadside inn. In the morning, long after the young man had finished davening and his breakfast, Reb Hillel was still deeply engrossed in tefillah. Hours went by, and Reb Hillel showed no signs of letting up. The driver continuously checked on Reb Hillel, who remained in a state of dveykus, completely oblivious to the passing time. When Reb Hillel finally completed his davening, the young man struggled to maintain his respectful tone and composure: “I just don’t understand! You so wanted to spend Shabbos with the Rebbe, and you promised to not shlep out your davening. It’s now well after noon, and there is no chance we will make it Lubavitch in time for Shabbos. We’ll have to stay here, or head back home! Chaval!” “Young man,” sighed Reb Hillel, “let’s say you set out to Leipzig Fair with the intention of buying some rare and exclusive merchandise. While ba-derech, on the way, you happened to meet another merchant offering those very wares at a below-market price. What a find! Imagine how foolish one would have to be to insist on continuing on to Leipzig. The entire purpose of the journey is not to arrive at some city or another, but to acquire the intended merchandise.” Reb Hillel’s intense glare then focused on the young man: “Why does one go to their rebbe, if not to draw spirituality and direction in avodas Hashem, and to strengthen himself in tefillah? The goal and purpose of heading to Lubavitch was to be uplifted. I ask you: if on the way there — right here in this inn — my davening is strong and inspired, should I dump the merchandise and run to ‘Leipzig’?” “...To the land that I will show you” (12:1) Medrash Rabbah (Bereishis Rabbah, 39:1) compares Avraham Avinu’s experience in our sedra to a wayfarer who encounters a palace aflame. As the palace burns and there seems to be no one who has taken responsibility, the wayfarer wonders outloud, “Is there no owner of this palace?!” Immediately, a window in the palace opens and the ba’al ha-birah, the master of the house, appears in it, gazing calmly at the wayfarer: “I am the owner of this palace.” Avraham Avinu finds the world in urgent need of rectification, in an incomplete state. He recognizes that everything is ablaze, in a state of chaos and disorder. The fires of idolatry and displaced priorities engulf the palace of Creation. Not only has humanity seemed to turn its back on Hashem, but Hashem, the Baal haBirah, seems to be absent. The Sefas Emes, Rebbe Yehuda Aryeh Leib Alter, zy’a, points out that it is this specific setting that spurred on the great mission Avraham Avinu was to undertake. Avraham needed to see the world as a burning palace, in dire need of salvation, yet with no caretaker. He also needed to “go out” of his land of birth without any specific instructions on what to do or where to go. By responding to the non-specific, ambiguous call of Lech Lecha, the Sefas Emes explains that Avraham Avinu has already essentially accomplished his task. More than achieving a specific goal or reaching a defined destination, our main calling in Divine service is simply cultivating a desire to draw close Hashem. Hashem ‘enjoys’ more nachas ruach, satisfaction, as it were, from our ratzon and intention to “go out” and fulfill His will, than He does when we actually fulfill it. Renowned psychologist and mindfulness guide, Rabbi Dr. Ben Epstein, has referenced Shel Silverstein’s “The Missing Piece”, the story of a Pacman-esque figure, an incomplete circle searching for love and purpose, its “missing piece”. Hinted in this children’s classic is our misled search for completion. This is our “fundamental flaw”: our perceived demand for completion and our seeking in the outside world for it. The implied lesson is that it is possible to achieve meaning and wholeness, even without acquiring a specific “missing piece”. Even when we have not reached a particular destination or achieved a desired bottom line, and our mission seems “incomplete,” — the journey itself is part of Hashem’s plan, and perfect in its own way. Rebbe Yitzchak Meir zy’a, the Chiddushei haRim (grandfather of the Sefas Emes), shares insight from the wording of the above-mentioned Medrash. The palace is ‘burning’, and this is the same term used by the Torah to describe Lavan’s pursuing of Yaakov Avinu: DALAKTA ACHAREI (Bereishis, 31:36). All of us, and everything in Creation is in a constant state of yearning and chasing after something. While in pursuit of wholeness, through cultivating sincere ratzon and yearning, we may find completion in our current state, exactly where we are... even if we won’t “make it to the town of Lubavitch in time for Shabbos”. RABBI MOSHE TARAGIN Lech Lecha: Why is Aliyah so Difficult? My Rebbe, Harav Yehuda Amital, would often remark "I don’t understand anything about Bereishit and Noach. I don’t know the difference between a ‘big bang’ and a ‘small bang.’ I begin reading the Torah from Lech Lecha. Hashem instructed Avraham to journey to Israel- that I understand." Avraham's epic journey launched Jewish history and has captivated the Jewish imagination for centuries. Sadly, though every Jew dreams of Yerushalayim and prays in her direction, not all of Avraham’s descendants have successfully retraced his steps. Why is this simple journey so difficult for so many? The gemara remarks that - the Land can only be accessed through struggle and hardship. Israel isn’t a normal country and doesn’t operate under the normal principles which govern other lands. Life under the eye of Hashem is supernatural, and the conditions of residence in Israel are outsized, stretching beyond human proportion. Settling Israel and living in Israel will always be demanding and will always require extraordinary effort and commitment. Departure To voyage to the Land of Hashem, Avraham must first delete his background. Purging his past pagan influences is a necessary precondition for his future life of faith and monotheism. Abandoning his past, his Lech-lecha journey poses numerous personal challenges. The Torah delineates the various elements of this personal trial: ME'ARTZECHA MIMOLADETCHA UMIBEIT AVICHA. Evidently, leaving your past behind is easier said than done. It is difficult to walk away from the “familiar”- the social norms you are accustomed to and the financial systems you were raised upon. Walking into a foreign culture and speaking a new language demands emotional flexibility and personal courage. And, of course leaving family behind, and raising your own family “alone”, is a steep price to pay for moving to the Land of Hashem. The road to Israel is paved with the surrender and sacrifice necessary to enter the house of Hashem. Religious Challenges Ironically, life in Israel, with its additional mitzvot often "complexifies" religion. Astonishingly, Rabbi Chaim Cohen, a 12th century French/German Tosafist counseled against Aliyah, due to the fear of violating unfamiliar mitzvot which are unique to life in Israel- such as Teruma. Though this position was roundly rejected, it does signal that religious life in Israel will always be more intricate and more "involved" than it is in exile. Throughout history political and economic conditions in Israel were oftentimes more demanding and less suitable for tranquil Torah study than they were in exile. The 2nd century Babylonian amora Rebbe Yehuda bar Yechezkeil, forbade his student Rav Ze’ira from moving to Israel, fearing in part that his disciple's Torah study would regress upon abandoning the epicenter of Torah which Babylonia had become. Life in the modern state of Israel challenges religious experience in a very different fashion. Generally, religious observance in exile reduces to a single variable: how can communities and individuals construct “protected” spaces of religious commitment. By contrast, religious life in Israel is generally a two-dimensional equation: in addition to preserving personal religious conduct, we also must ensure that our state is infused with a religious nature. How can we expand religion to every Israeli citizen – even those who don’t adhere to halacha in the classic forms, while still valuing their Judaism and their heritage. Extending religion nationally sometimes "clashes" with personal piety and the maintenance of personal religious experience. Kashrut observance is a perfect example of a more complicated national dynamic in Israel. Outside of Israel, kashrut standards are established exclusively for “interested” and willful kashrut consumers who are generally interested in strict standards. By contrast “national kashrut” in Israel is geared for the broader public and cannot always be established with the strict standards which many religiously oriented people may prefer. Ironically, one of the challenges of life in Israel is a more complex religious experience. Living in the Land of Hashem, especially while it is still under historical construction isn’t always straightforward. The complexity is built-in. This is a different Land with very different norms and dynamics. Turning Dreams Into "Reality" What happens when our dreams become a reality? In general, reality leaves a lot to the imagination. Avraham discovered this truth when he first arrived in Israel: He was promised a Land of prosperity and divine supervision. Anticipating a magical Land, he discovers that food is sparse and that the Land of prosperity is parched by famine. Subsequently, his own family begins to disband. His nephew Lot– part of a younger generation which may not fully identify with Avraham's pioneering spirit- abandons Avraham and his "inspired lifestyle". Immigrants are always separated by a culture gap which tries their ability to raise a younger generation. Furthermore, Avraham discovers that even in this Land of divine machinery, wars are waged, hostages are taken, negotiations are conducted and politics reigns. The gap between the Land he was promised and the actual country he arrived in was enormous. Our own expectations for life in Israel tend to swell well beyond realistic possibilities. Life in the real country of Israel often feels pedestrian or humdrum, challenging us to reconcile our resplendent dreams with an ordinary and sometimes dreary reality. A few years after making aliyah, I invited a Rebbe of mine from the United States to visit me in Israel. He remarked that it would be sacrilegious for him to visit Israel for a mere few weeks as a tourist and return home afterwards. Travel to Israel demanded the gravitas and solemnity due this holy Land. While I was impressed with his reverence for Israel, it was also obvious that his veneration carried a heavy price: he remained distant from our Land for decades. In our holy Land we also pay taxes, take out the garbage and deal with the common and petty tedium of life. Living in Israel comes with great anticipation but reality doesn’t always match our grandest expectations. On his fateful journey, Avraham faced numerous trials: he surrenders his past and discovers a Land of wars and politics and not just of dreams and divine promises. All of his children who have followed in his footsteps have faced similar challenges. Short-term ideals, though, must not obscure the long-term grandeur of making Aliyah. For those seeking a life of convenience, the adversity of aliyah can feel daunting. For those seeking a life of prophecy, they are minute or even meaningless. Moving to Israel and joining the ranks of Jewish history is a decision which stretches beyond our personal lives and individual conditions. It is a decision for our people and for our future and a decision which will be applauded by that future specifically because it carried personal sacrifice. The honor and privilege of contributing to the final chapters of Jewish history far surpasses hardships and heartache. Avraham set the mold for this journey and we are fortunate to march down his path. RABBI EZRA FRIEDMAN Determining The Status of Shemitah Produce Shemitah produce maintains special laws, which require different handling than that of regular produce. These include, ownership being relinquished from shemitah produce, no halachic tithes are taken and the special manner in which shemitah produce is handled. As crops do not all grow at the same time, and in certain stores or even gardens shemitah and regular produce can get mixed, it is important to understand the halachic implications of shemitah produce. Halachically, the point of growth that the produce has reached upon the start of the New Year, determines whether the produce is classified as sixth or seventh year produce. Additionally, according to Torah law the stage of growth, which qualifies the produce as shemitah produce depends on the type of crop. Fruit The stage, which determines whether tree fruits have kedushat shevi’it (holy shemitah produce) is called “chanitah”. The Hebrew term generally refers to the formation of fruit. However, there is a dispute amongst halachic authorities regarding the exact meaning of the halachic term. According to the Rambam (Shemitah Veyovel 4:9), once the fruit has reached a size which would render it edible (even if it’s not especially tasty) it becomes holy shemitah fruit. In practice, this is about a third of the actual size of the fruit when it’s ripe. The Rash (Rav Shimshon of Sens) ruled that the stage, which renders fruit as having kedushat shevi’it is much earlier. The Rash rules that once a bud is visible the status is established. This dispute has very practical applications. According to the Rash, if the fruit started to bud before Rosh Hashanah, it is considered from the sixth year (and has no holiness). According to the Rambam, however, the fruit would be considered holy shemitah fruit as it grew to a third of its actual size during shemitah itself. In addition, not only does this dispute effect fruit during the shemitah year, it would also affect fruit during the eighth year, as well. If fruit started to blossom near the end of the shemitah year (end of Elul), according to the Rash the fruit would have kedushat shevi’it, while according to the Rambam the fruit has no holiness since the critical stage of growth only occurred during the eighth year. The Chazon Ish (7:11-12) discussed the dispute yet does not write a concrete ruling. Some have quoted later authorities like Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and Rav Shaul Yisraeli as being stringent according to both opinions (see Katif Shevi’it p.119). Various kashrut certifications in Israel rule regarding fruit based on their opinions. Regarding a tree in a private garden one should consult with a competent halachic authority. Lemons Etrogim for shemitah have a unique status and even though they are fruit from a tree, once they are picked, they have the status of holy shemitah fruit even if they were completely ripe prior to Rosh Hashanah. Authorities debate whether lemons have the same status of etrogim regarding shemitah. Rav Shlomo of Siriloi (Yerushalmi Shevi’it 9:4) ruled that lemons are like etrogim and once they are picked they have kedushat shevi’it. Rav Mordechai Eliyahu ruled in the same fashion. In practice, most poskim are lenient. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, for example, brings that the Rambam only mentioned etrogim as the unique exception. If lemons had the same ruling, the Rambam would have mentioned other similar fruit, as well. The more lenient ruling is accepted by later authorities (see Sefer Hashemitah p.11 and Kedushat Ha’aretz p.306). All other citrus fruit such as oranges and pomelos are categorized like other fruit trees and only if chanitah occurred after Rosh Hashanah are they considered holy shemitah fruit (Mishpetei Eretz 15:8). Mixtures of fruit on the tree In certain cases, the same tree could have fruit that is both from the sixth and seventh year. In such a case, it is recommended to indicate with a recognizable sign (liking wrapping a ribbon) in order to differentiate between the fruit that is kedushat shevi’it and the fruit that is not (see Katif Shevi’it p.118). The same situation can arise at the end of shemitah in which the tree could simultaneously have shemitah and eighth year fruit. Generally in halacha when there is a mixture between kosher and non-kosher food there are laws of nullification. However, regarding a mixture of shemitah fruit (such as on a tree) the halacha is different. In a case where the owner of a tree has a mixture of shemitah and non-shemitah fruit then the classic rule of majority applies. If the majority of the mixture is non-shemitah fruit then all the fruit is not required in the laws of shemitah (even those holy fruit mixed unintentionally). However, if shemitah fruit was mixed up and cooked with other non-shemitah fruit, then the entire dish must be treated as holy shemitah fruit. The Rambam (on Mishnah Avodah Zara 5:8) explains that since there is a possibility to eat all the produce in a holy manner there is no need for nullification. Therefore, for cooked fruits, even if one fruit that has kedushat shevi’it is mixed in the dish, we rule stringently and all fruit must be treated in the appropriate manner (see Derech Emuna 7:144). In Summary Fruit that has reached the level of “chanitah” before Rosh Hashanah maintains the status of holy shemitah produce There is a dispute what is considered chanitah. Most kashrut certifications rule stringently both at the beginning and end of shemitah. Lemons, as opposed to etrogim, are classified like fruit trees and only have kedushat shevi’it if they blossomed after shemitah. It is recommended to make an indication to differentiate between sixth and shemitah year fruit on trees. In the case of a mixture of shemitah and non-shemitah fruit, if the majority of the mixture is non-shemitah, then all the fruit is considered non-shemitah fruit and does not have kedushat shevi’it. If the fruit was cooked, no matter how minimal the kedushat shevi’it content, the entire dish must be treated as holy produce. RABBI SAM SHOR Parshat Lech Lecha begins with the instruction to Avram to leave behind all that is familiar to him and go to the Land that Hashem will show him. The expression Lech Lecha-You shall go, you-seems at first glance to be redundant. Rashi, in a well known comment explains this seeming redundancy- lech lecha- you shall go for yourself- lehanatcha uletovatcha -for your own satisfaction and good. It is there that you will become a great nation, here you will not merit to have children, and only there will your true nature become revealed in the world. In explaining Rashi’s words, the Tiferet Shlomo, the Rebbe of Radomsk asks the question, seemingly Avraham had wealth and material success, so what exactly is Rashi pointing out for us? What does it mean that he must leave behind all that is familiar to him in order to go to the Land, which will ultimately be for his own benefit and good? The Rebbe explains that beyond having his own biological children which he will merit only upon entering Eretz Yisrael, Avraham Avinu’s nature and essence is to do chesed, to show compassion and consideration for others. In his own birthplace, surrounded by the culture of Avoda Zara, his ability to spread his legacy of kindness and love, would be limited by the push back of the idolatrous ways of those around him. However, upon entering the Land of Israel, his legacy of kindness, and ability to connect with and transform others would begin to blossom and spread. Rabbi Yaakov Friedman,zy’a, the Rebbe of Hosiyatin, who made aliya to Tel Aviv in the late 1930’s and lived through the formative years of the establishment of the State of Israel, during the turbulent times of both the days leading up to the Declaration of Independence, the subsequent war, and the earliest days of our fledgling state, was a powerful voice for the importance and significance of the return of the Jewish People to the Land that was promised to Avraham Avinu. In a powerful teaching about Teshuva, and how the Torah promises that the Jewish people will always have the opportunity to renew our connection to Hashem and his Torah, the Rebbe points to our Rashi as well. The Rebbe wrote that the promised renewal and transformation will not come from within America, from England, or from any other country(the Rebbe’s words!) Rather, just as Hashem promised to Avraham Avinu, that when he will come to this Land he will indeed become a progenitor of a great nation, that he will indeed prosper and be able to truly grow to his full potential and impact the entire world, so too the Jewish People, as we return to Eretz Yisrael will also begin to make manifest our full potential and impact the entire world. Baruch Hashem, today, seventy years since the Rebbe first uttered these words, we see our small State as a leader in many fields, from technology and ingenuity to morality and ethics- impacting, protecting, and transforming the entire world. Indeed, like Avraham Avinu before us, the impact that so many individual members of Klal Yisrael have made since we have merited to follow in Avraham’s footsteps and make aliya to that very land of promise, is simply beyond comprehension. Yehi Ratzon, that we may see many more of our brothers and sisters merit to make aliya, to bring their talents and innovative spirit to the Israeli landscape, and to contribute to Israel’s global impact in making the world a brighter, better place. RABBI ANTHONY MANNING The Prize Of Patience We live in an age of immediacy where few of us have the patience we once had. Instant messaging encourages us to expect instant replies. Downloads which used to take hours can now be done in minutes, yet we become frustrated after seconds. As a teacher I have also seen the gradual eroding of intellectual patience in students who not only demand, but often psychologically need, answers to their questions now. Even though some questions can, and should, be temporarily shelved, to be revisited when one is more mature and experienced, it has become increasingly difficult for people to muster the patience to accept growth and development over the longer term. Parashat Lech Lecha is a tutorial in the imperative and ultimate spiritual reward of patience. Avraham receives two repeated promises from God – that he will have a large number of descendants (12:2, 13:16, 15:5, 17:6, 22:17) and that he and those descendants will inherit the land of Israel (13:15, 13:17, 15:7). The former promise can naturally only be achieved slowly over generations and God promises Avraham (15:4) that he will, even at this late stage, have a child from whom later offspring will descend. There is no indication at this point that the child must be born miraculously through Sarah, and Avraham is confident in God’s promise. However, conquest and possession of Eretz Yisrael was promised to Avraham personally and, after his stunning defeat of the 4 superpower kings in Chapter 14, it seems that a quick military victory over the tribal chieftains of Canaan is within immediate reach. But when Avraham pushes impatiently for progress (15:8), he receives some sobering news. The land will indeed come to him and his descendants, but only after 400 years! The Kli Yakar (15:8 s.v. bema) cannot accept the explanation that this long delay could be a response to Avraham questioning God, even if that challenge was inappropriate on some level. Rather the Divine plan is methodical and unfolds over centuries, not days or even years. The Bechor Shor (15:8) explains that something can be promised to an individual but only comes to realization after generations. The individual achieves the goal, but only through their descendants in whom they live on. Another more subtle focus in the Parasha on the importance of taking the long view comes in Chapter 14, when the Torah spends valuable verses listing the indigenous peoples who were destroyed by the 4 kings during their devastating rampage through the Middle East and the countries laid waste by their defeat: the Rephaim destroyed in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, the Emim in Shaveh Kiryathaim, and the Horites in Seir. The Malbim asks what possible interest anyone could have in this information, which was ancient history even when the Torah was given. In response he flags the only other time in Chumash where these people are mentioned – in Devarim Chapter 2, where Moshe encourages the Jewish people to have confidence in their ultimate conquest of Eretz Yisrael. These first nations had been destroyed by the 4 kings, who were themselves also now consigned to the dust of history. But the lands that were laid waste eventually came into the possession of the family of Avraham – Ammon, Moav and Esav – as a fulfilment of God’s promise. In turn, these lands and others would come to the Jewish people, but none of this could have happened without the slow development of history and politics. These ideas should resonate with us today. Anyone with an appreciation of the historical and political events leading up to the creation of the State of Israel cannot fail to be overwhelmed by the sheer improbability of any of these events happening independently, let alone their unimaginable combination. We look back with the confidence of hindsight but, in those moments, only someone with the patience to take a long view on redemption could have pieced things together and remained calm and confident. There is nothing wrong with calling out stridently for Mashiach or for Peace. But when this becomes “Mashiach Now” or “Peace Now” things usually start to unravel. The former British Prime Minister John Major said: “The first requirement of politics is not intellect or stamina but patience. Politics is a very long run game and the tortoise will usually beat the hare.” Major discovered that this truth was not popular with an impatient electorate (who preferred the leporine excitement of fast-moving Tony Blair!) But we cannot afford to make such a mistake in our perspective on Geula and the redemptive process. Every day in our prayers we look forward expectantly to the possibility of God’s salvation, which can come in the blink of an eye. But, as faithful descendants of Avraham, we patiently push forward – step by step – the process of redemption, in the comfort that the ultimate and complete Geula will indeed come to us, but perhaps through our great-grandchildren. MENACHEM PERSOFF Give Us a Piece of Peace! Lech Lecha! Avraham is instructed to leave his home and family and make his way to the “land which I will show you.” Like many Olim in our times, Avraham must have wondered what life would be like in the new land. Little would he know that some of the issues with which he contended portended similar challenges for Israeli citizens today. For example, Avraham and his nephew Lot were both in possession of “flocks, cattle, and tents” such that there was not sufficient land to accommodate their respective holdings. As a result, the shepherds from each camp fought over the grazing fields, so much so that Lot’s herdsmen encroached on other people’s pastures (Rashi), including Avraham’s fields (Ramban). Notably, the narrative adds that “the Canaanite and the Perizzite were then dwelling in the land.” Now, Avraham would have an additional worry on his head: The native residents would become aware of the extent of the land and riches over which the herdsmen were fighting. In their greed, these indigenous tribes would ‘defend their territory’ and attack Avraham and Lot’s properties with disastrous results (Ramban). The strife between the shepherds might well induce us to reflect on the antagonism that some of the early religious kibbutz settlers faced from the left-wing socialist kibbutzniks. To explain this unfortunate episode, we need to recall that in their efforts to create a “New Jew,” the majority of left-wing kibbutzniks discarded the old traditions of their parents. For the most part, it appears that they could not bear seeing religious farmers in their midst. However, little did these secular pioneers know that they were following in the footsteps of the biblical Lot who, having settled in the fertile lands of Sodom, abandoned his religious way of life. Now, Avraham’s answer to Lot was as follows: “Please let there not be strife between me and you…for we are kinsmen.” Perhaps, it would be a good idea for all of us, in this day and age, to internalize that plea as we attempt to make sense of the reality in Israel. Therefore, let there be continuously on our lips the prayer OSEH SHALOM BIMROMAV HU YASEH SHALOM ALEINU V'AL KOL YISROEL VIMRU AMEN - “May He who makes peace in high places, make peace for us and all of Israel – And [let us] say Amen.” RABBI AARON GOLDSCHEIDER Chibat Ha’aretz: Loving the Land Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik shared the following in his eulogy for Rabbi Zev Gold, who was a leading figure in the Religious Zionist movement and one of the signatores of the Israeli Declaration of Independence. “I will never forget the evening in 5695 [1935] when I visited Rabbi [Zev] Gold in Ramat Gan in Eretz Yisrael. He took me out to the orange groves near his house. It was a beautiful night, the sky was a perfect blue and there were endless stars. The bright moon of Eretz Yisrael shone all over the enchanted beauty, from afar we could see the lights of the all-Jewish city of Tel Aviv glistening in the dark. The lights were telling us the thrilling and intoxicating news of the rebuilding of the Holy Land. Overwhelmed with emotion, Rabbi Gold gazed toward the horizon and then turned to me and said: “Whoever does not feel the presence of God in Eretz Yisrael on this beautiful night while looking at the magnificent moon and at these beckoning stars, breathing the clear and pure air filled with fragrance of blossoming growth, and above all when looking at the glistening lights of the city that was built entirely by Jews, is simply blind.” Rabbi Gold continued, “Rav Yehudah HaLevi [1075-1141] was right when he said that prophecy flows unhindered in Eretz Yisrael and we need only a proper vessel to receive its message” [Kuzari 2:8-11]. As we stood there, Rabbi Gold picked up a small pebble and kissed it, to fulfill Rav Abba’s dictum in the Talmud that he would kiss the rocks of Akko [Ketuvot 112a]. That night, I thought to myself how insignificant I was compared to this special Jew who was able to experience the glory of God through the grandeur of the landscape of the Land of Israel” (The Rav, Vol. 2, Rakeffet, p. 118). Not only is the custom of kissing the stones of Eretz Yisrael mentioned in the Talmud but the Rambam is his halachic code states this loving practice: “The great Sages would kiss the borders of Eretz Yisrael, kiss its’ stones and roll in its dust” (Hilchot Melachim 5:10). Perhaps we can trace this deep desire to the Torah’s indelible account of Avraham’s departure from his home, “To the Land that I will show you” (Beresheit 11:1). The commentators wonder if Avraham knew from the outset where his final destination would be. Did God reveal to him his final destination? The classic commeraty of the Ibn Ezra answered in the affirmative. “To the Land that I will show you “ (11:1) is followed by the verse which states, “And they went forth to go to the land of Canaan” (11:5). Evidently God directed him to the Land. Rashi suggests that when Avraham first set out on the journey, he was unaware of the place God had in mind. “God did not reveal to him the Land immediately in order to make it beloved in his [Avraham’s} eyes…” (Rashi 12:1) Rabbi Soloveitchik was drawn to the unique approach of the Ramban. After departing for an unknown location Avraham wandered from one place to another. He explored many countries. He wondered if he had found the place that God had intended or not. The Ramban states (Gen.12:1), [Avraham] wandered from nation to nation, until he came to the land of Canaan, where He [God] said to him: “To your seed I give this Land.” Only once Avraham discovered the Land for himself did God confirm with him that he had correctly identified the Land. What is the significance of Avraham locating the site of sanctity? The Rav suggested that this notion contains a foundational principle for us as Jews. “The Almighty has implanted in the Jew a sensitivity to kedusha, to the holy.” In other words, the Jew naturally yearns for holiness and seeks to uncover and recognize it even when on the surface it is not apparent. This idea of Avraham discovering the place of holiness also is suggestive of the idea that knowledge of God is not something purely theoretical and intellectual but is passionate and perceptible (Abraham’s Journey pp. 60-61). RABBI DANIEL MANN Breaking a Plate with a Religious Text Question: A friend made an artistic plate to break at my daughter’s engagement party. The pasuk, “ahavat olam tavi lahem” (bring them eternal love) is written on it. May we break such a plate? Answer: Mazal tov! After commanding to destroy avoda zara, the Torah says: “Do not do so to Hashem” (Devarim 12:4). The gemara (Makkot 22a) takes this as a prohibition to destroy objects associated with Hashem/service of Him. The Rambam (Yesodei HaTorah 6:1, 7) lists a few full violations: erasing a Name of Hashem, destructively removing a stone from a Temple or altar, and burning such a structure (ibid.). Destroying p’sukim from Tanach and their commentaries is a lower-level violation (ibid. 8). Thus, your concern is grounded, but we will look for alleviating factors. First, presumably your interest is to break the plate, not specifically the pasuk. The gemara (Arachin 6a) says that holy writing on an object sanctifies only the part of the object that contains the text; one may cut off that part and use the rest of it (see Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh Deah 276:13). The rule of davar she’eino mitkaven allows one to do a permitted action even if it might (but also might not) unintentionally accomplish something that is prohibited (this rule is not limited to Shabbat - see Nazir 42a). It is questionable though whether this reasoning would make it fully permitted to break a plate with a pasuk. After all, there are halachot that require one to avoid situations in which danger might come to holy texts (Ginzei Hakodesh 2:1; see Rosh Hashana 18b). To break the plate in a manner that the letters are likely to be severed is thus at least against the spirit of the law, if not its letter. Common practice allows to erase words of Torah from a blackboard. While some posit that this is only permitted to replace it with other divrei Torah, due to little alternative (Shut HaTashbetz I:2), we erase blackboards after Torah classes even to use them for mundane writing. The Ein Yitzchak (OC 5:11) explains that when it was written in order to erase thereafter, it is considered as intention to not bestow kedusha on the writing. Similarly here, the plate designer wrote the text for it to be broken and the letters likely severed, and therefore it was not sanctified. One could argue that only destructive breaking is forbidden (see Rambam ibid. 7), and here the breaking is a festive, holy act. However, this exaggerates the minhag. According to most (see Eliya Rabba, OC 560:7; Mishna Berura 560:9), the reason is to remember the pain of the destruction of the Beit Hamikdash. Thus, our intention is to destroy, albeit for a good cause. The Aruch Hashulchan (Even Haezer 50:26) explains that breaking the vessel represents finalization of the tena’im document (which not everyone has at engagement parties). Either way, it is unclear that this is a sufficiently positive religious act to justify destroying something with a holy text. The Pri Megadim (60, MZ 4) explains that we use a vessel from pottery, preferably an already broken one, because the minhag does not justify wasting a fine utensil. Therefore, any trend to purposely make an arguably kadosh utensil just to break it seems regrettable. Here, the plate was made with the best intentions, and there is likely concern about insulting your friend by not using it, and we have already seen reasonable grounds for leniency. This case has clearer grounds for leniency. First, the words’ meaning is borrowed (melitza) from the Torah context, a request that Hashem show his love for Israel (here it must be that the couple should have long-lasting love). The halachot of a pasuk do not apply to melitzot even using the precise words (Shulchan Aruch, YD 284:2). Finally, these words are not a pasuk but come from Musaf of Rosh Chodesh (albeit modeled after Yirmiyahu 31:2). While we treat entire prayers with care, a few words from one without Hashem’s Name do not have kedusha (Ginzei Hakodesh 10:14). Therefore, you may break the plate in question. Gavriel Novick, Director of Regional Development It’s Good to be Home Following Hashem’s command, Avram arrives in Eretz Yisrael at the beginning of the parsha. He passes through Shechem and then to Bet El where he pitches his tent and builds an altar for Hashem. Shortly after his arrival he is forced to relocate to Egypt as there is a famine in the Land of Israel. After Avram’s episode in Egypt he returns to Eretz Yisrael. He travels “from the south and until Bet El, until the place where his tent had been previously; to the place of the altar that he had made at first, and Avram called there in the name of God.” The Torah stresses that Avram returned to the same place he had been before. There is a certain comfort in returning to a familiar place and certainly in coming home. Even after an exciting or relaxing vacation there is something nice about coming back to your regular bed with the pillow and sheets that are already familiar to you. Bet El was such a headquarters for Avram and according to the Torah’s account, it was not a comfy bed that Avram missed most. Rather his altar to Hashem was most important to him and inspired him to connect with God once again, as the Torah relates “and Avram called there in the name of God.” The Land of Israel serves as that original home to all Jewish people. There is certainly a sense of comfort in not needing to hide or feel embarrassed by our Jewish identity and practices. There are also the familiar sites of Jerusalem and the Kotel which we pray towards from across the globe, making us feel at home here. On a deeper level though, Israel has the power to inspire us to connect more deeply to God. Just as when Avram returned to Bet El and reconnected with the altar he originally built there he was inspired to again call out in the name of God, we also can connect with the stories, buildings and landmarks our ancestors created in this Land and similarly be motivated to become closer to Hashem. But coming on an Aliyah flight to Israel does not always look or feel like coming to a nice comfortable and familiar home. Aliyah often comes with challenges. It often comes with a feeling of being lost or foreign, the exact opposite of feeling at home. Although our Jewish roots are always connected to the Land of Israel, practically, new olim can feel very out of place. This is especially true of teenagers coming on Aliyah without a network of friends and advisors to guide them in their new surroundings. In 2015, NCSY Israel was created to address this exact problem. NCSY Israel serves as the only youth movement specifically dedicated to Anglo teen olim, helping them with their unique challenges and providing them with role models and a network of support. Although the Aliyah transition can be hard and uncomfortable, NCSY Israel is proud to enable teens to feel at home.